Once your proposal has been accepted for consideration, we request the submission of the full manuscript. Submissions are only considered if the manuscript has not been offered for publication elsewhere. Typically, authors are expected to submit their final manuscript within twelve months, although we are open to discussing extensions if needed. Please refer to our Style Guide & Manuscript Presentation for formatting guidelines.

The refereeing process involves sending the final manuscript to two peer-reviewers for feedback, with a request for their comments within three months, where possible. Based on the referees' reports, our directors decide whether to approve the manuscript for publication. Authors are asked to consider referees' recommendations, if any, to enhance the manuscript. Depending on the extent of revisions, referees may be consulted again for additional feedback. An additional condition of acceptance is ensuring the manuscript is proofread and styled according to our guidelines, with necessary copy-editing done to maintain a high level of English.

Upon acceptance of the final manuscript for publication, authors receive a contract to sign, marking the beginning of the publication process.

Before the publication process commences, authors must provide all image and audiovisual files at the correct resolution, with copyright issues cleared and permissions obtained. Instructions for image submission are provided in our Information on Images section.

Authors are also requested to provide a list of terms for inclusion in the index, unless an embedded index is created within the final Word manuscript.

The publication process involves listing the title on our website with assigned ISBNs and a DOI, accompanied by a drafted blurb. Following approval by the author, we proceed to typeset the book, insert illustrations, audio, or video files, index the book, and prepare proofs for the author's final approval, typically within four to six weeks. Editions of the book are assigned ISBN numbers and a DOI upon acceptance for publication.

Authors are encouraged to create additional digital resources related to the book for posting on our website, such as photographs, case studies, tables, data, additional contributions, and conference papers, to enrich the title's content and longevity.

Peer Review Process

At Pink Petals Publications, we are committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity and quality in all published works. Our peer review process ensures that every submission undergoes a rigorous and transparent evaluation, in line with the principles of open access publishing guidelines.

1. Initial Submission Check

Upon receiving a manuscript, our editorial team conducts a preliminary review to:

• Confirm alignment with the scope and objectives of Pink Petals Publications.
• Ensure adherence to submission guidelines, including formatting and ethical considerations.

Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria are returned to the authors with detailed feedback.

2. Selection of Reviewers

Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts. Reviewers are chosen based on:

• Expertise in the relevant academic field.
• Absence of conflicts of interest with the authors.

The peer review process is conducted under a double-blind review system, where the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential.

3. Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers assess submissions based on:

• Originality and contribution to the field.
• Methodological soundness and research validity.
• Clarity of presentation and adherence to ethical standards.
• Relevance to the intended audience.

Reviewers provide constructive feedback and make recommendations for acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection.

4. Review Timeline

We strive to ensure a swift review process. Reviewers are typically given 3–4 weeks to submit their evaluations. Authors are informed of the decision within 6–8 weeks from the initial submission.

5. Revision Process

If revisions are requested:

• Authors must address all comments and resubmit the revised manuscript within the stipulated timeframe.
• Revisions are reassessed by the original reviewers to ensure all concerns have been adequately addressed.

6. Final Decision

The final decision on the manuscript's acceptance lies with the editorial board, which considers:

• Reviewer recommendations.
• The quality of revisions made by the author(s).
• Alignment with Pink Petals Publications' mission and objectives.

7. Post-Acceptance and Transparency

• Accepted manuscripts are subject to a final round of proofreading and formatting before publication.
• All published works are assigned a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and made freely accessible under a Creative Commons License, ensuring compliance with open access standards.

8. Appeals and Complaints

Authors who wish to appeal a decision can submit a formal request to the editor-in-chief. Appeals are reviewed independently, and a final decision is communicated within 15 working days.

Pink Petals Publications remains dedicated to fostering a transparent, ethical, and inclusive peer review environment. For further details, please contact us.